2012:Mechanical: Difference between revisions
Mechanical2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mechanical1 (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| | ||
Beater Bar | '''Beater Bar''' | ||
[http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si] | [http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si] | ||
Line 22: | Line 20: | ||
Roughtop Tread 8" OD x 2" Wide ROUGHTOP-820 In stock | Roughtop Tread 8" OD x 2" Wide ROUGHTOP-820 In stock | ||
*Placed Collector/Actuator onto Robot assembly | |||
*Made Sprocket http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0099.htm | |||
*Made Bearing for Beater bar http://www.mcmaster.com/#6383k234/=fwn7tc | |||
*Figured out we neeed a larger shaft and sorted out following problems | |||
-Size/Placement issues | |||
-How to make a sprocket in inventor | |||
<u>'''Conveyor System:'''</u> | <u>'''Conveyor System:'''</u> |
Latest revision as of 15:06, 21 January 2012
Resources
Master Task List
Engineering Notebook Templates Available at: Engineering_Notebook_Template
Please Label All Notebook Pages 2012:Mechanical 2 MM.DD to avoid confusion.
Beater Bar
http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si
http://www.vexrobotics.com/products/vexpro/ifi-wheel-tread.html
Roughtop Tread 8" OD x 2" Wide ROUGHTOP-820 In stock
*Placed Collector/Actuator onto Robot assembly
*Made Sprocket http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0099.htm
*Made Bearing for Beater bar http://www.mcmaster.com/#6383k234/=fwn7tc *Figured out we neeed a larger shaft and sorted out following problems
-Size/Placement issues -How to make a sprocket in inventor
Conveyor System:
conveyor system pros and cons -
Design 1: Motors Only
Pros:
• Constant speed (assuming battery voltage does not drop dramatically)
• More space below the conveyor to accommodate the drivetrain transmissions and motors.
• Smooth transmission between different stages of the conveyor to the turret.
• Less possible states for the last stage of the design.
Cons:
• Cannot actually push the ball past the turret line. There needs to be a hand off so there will be a transition stage.
Design 2: Pneumatics and Motors
Pros:
• Need one less motor.
• Compressor is already on the robot.
• Higher handoff to the turret, goes past the turret line.
• Lower height than turret.
• When the supply is available, speed and force of ball feed will be consistant.
Cons:
• Takes up more space in the back bottom part of the robot.
• Requires ball to settle time into cup prior to firing.
• Lose contact with ball when going into last stage.
• Hard to manufacture the bowl for the launcher unless we buy it, work around could be square on point.
• Amy and Mr. Wolf feel that the linear action is more complicated than the rotary action.
Archives
2011 Mechanical Page2010 Mechanical Page2009 Mechanical_1 Page