2019:Drive Base: Difference between revisions

From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output">
<div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output">
Saturday Week 1
Saturday Week 1


Line 19: Line 19:
*developed four inch wheel prototype  
*developed four inch wheel prototype  
**used field to test four inch wheels on ramp   
**used field to test four inch wheels on ramp   
[[File:DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg|400px]]
*used cad to study wheels needed for H2  
*used cad to study wheels needed for H2  
**tested 4,6,and 8 wheel configs   
**tested 4,6,and 8 wheel configs   
Line 47: Line 50:


&nbsp;
&nbsp;
</div> </div>
</div> </div> </div>

Revision as of 17:59, 8 January 2019

Saturday Week 1

Jonathan Farnham

  • Kickoff
  • prelimanary ideas developed by drive base team
  • areas of concern
    • ramp to H1: 3 inches
    • H2 height above bumpers
    • drive base will never scale H3

Sunday Week 1

Jonathan Farnham

  • developed four inch wheel prototype
    • used field to test four inch wheels on ramp

DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg

  • used cad to study wheels needed for H2
    • tested 4,6,and 8 wheel configs

Tuesday Week 1 

By Jonathan Farnham

  • decisions being made about drive train configuration
    • wheel size decisions need to be made
    • choice of  motor needs to be made: Cim or Neo
    • number of wheels needs to be decided
  • developed cad prototype base on variant of last years drive system

DriveBaseSegment1.PNG

 

  • waiting on decision from strategy about habitat 2 or habitat 3 requirement
    • does drive base have to scale H2?
    • If we scale H3 then can we use smaller wheels on drive base?
    • does drive base have to develop H2 solution?