2019:Drive Base: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:04, 8 January 2019

Dimensions: 34L x less than 28W

Saturday Week 1

Jonathan Farnham

Kickoff
prelimanary ideas developed by drive base team
areas of concern
- ramp to H1: 3 inches
- H2 height above bumpers
- drive base will never scale H3

Sunday Week 1

Jonathan Farnham

Tuesday Week 1

By Jonathan Farnham

decisions being made about drive train configuration
- wheel size decisions need to be made
- choice of motor needs to be made: Cim or Neo
- number of wheels needs to be decided
developed cad prototype base on variant of last years drive system

waiting on decision from strategy about habitat 2 or habitat 3 requirement
- does drive base have to scale H2?
- If we scale H3 then can we use smaller wheels on drive base?
- does drive base have to develop H2 solution?

Wedensday Week 1

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output">
+<div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output">
+== Decisions and Specifications ==
+----
+Dimensions: 34L x less than 28W
+&nbsp;
+== Activity Log ==
+----
 Saturday Week 1
@@ Line 18: / Line 30: @@
 *developed four inch wheel prototype
-**used field to test four inch wheels on ramp
+*[[File:DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg|400px]]
+*used field to test four inch wheels on ramp
-[[File:DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg|400px]]
+&nbsp;
 *used cad to study wheels needed for H2
@@ Line 48: / Line 61: @@
 ----
+Wedensday Week 1
 &nbsp;
-</div> </div> </div>
+</div> </div> </div> </div>