2009:Mechanical 2.17.2009: Difference between revisions

From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: After the completion of the Rally on Monday 2/16 and our ensuing mechanical team discussion ending at 11:45 PM regarding the issue of the present robot conveyor design’s inability to mai...)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
After the completion of the Rally on Monday 2/16 and our ensuing mechanical team discussion ending at 11:45 PM regarding the issue of the present robot conveyor design’s inability to maintain the conveyor belts on the pulleys under adverse ball loading conditions I offer the following potential design alterations in remedate of the problem.
Discussion moved to: http://www.penfieldrobotics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Mechanical_2.16.2009<br>


In consideration of the present physical and time constraints we could emulating a similar conveyor belting implementation as the Honeoye falls team by making 1.5” diameter x 21.87” long cylinders out of PVC, creating round belt paths at 1.75 inch centers using the belt material that the Honeoye team has graciously offered to supply us at no charge. Additionally replace the solid ¾ Aluminum shaft with ½ inch 1/16 wall Aluminum tubing for the top 3 front shafts and the 2rear shafts, reducing weight and assembly/disassembly difficulty since ½” matches the diameter of the present conveyor shaft bearings.
== Kims Notes ==


Further considering, when we have the belt spacing at 1.5-2 inches the ball path opening probably has to be between 8-8.5 inches not to create excessive deformity of the balls leading to damage of the ball playing piece. With the present frame structure, bearing mounts and range of adjustment, we would need to reduce the pulley diameters for the new top 3 front row belt pulleys and top 2 rear row pulleys to approximately 1.5 inches. That would allow for a ball path opening with the adjustment we have to be a maximum of approximately 8.75 inches.
I stopped in this morning, and wanted to update the mechanical teams on what was currently in progress. Larry, Theo and Shauna got there at 6am this morning to start working, I got there about 7:30, and Ted &amp; Rika arrived around 8:15.


That would leave the plucker and divider setup on the front and lower conveyors all the same.
1. The burnt RS-545 motor from the back conveyor was removed &amp; replaced with a fischer Price motor (I think last night), but then this morning we switched it back to an RS-545 (realized we already had 2 Fischer Price setups)


One thing that we may also consider is to then remove the 2 outer outside plucker belts from the inside of the frame to outside the frame and add more pluckers to the front lower shaft. This will eliminate throwing that belt with was the last event that occurred during the final test last night and having pluckers interfere into the drive belts.
2. The Fischer Price &amp; gearbox was removed from the top shooter assembly, and is now mounted in place for the back conveyor so both conveyors now have Fischer Price Motors with the good pinion setups (we found that the pinions were cracking because the FP shafts were just slightly larger, so Larry turned down the shafts and pressed the pinions on this time - and they even sound much better!!)


It was proven accidently during that short test last night, that the front pluckers by themselves can gather a ball and push it very easily up the conveyor path with no belts attached in the proximity of the plucker gathering entrance as ball accidently entering that side would actually enter the conveyor lane with no belts would be thrown back out of the front of the robot at TomC
3. I ordered 10 more pinion gears, and an RS-385 25:1 transmission. They did not have any more of the 545's so we can take the mounting plate from the extra transmission (or one if we damage it), and the 25:1 planetary gearboxes are the same, so we just move the transmission plate over and have a replacement gearbox. The new gearbox is strictly as a spare anyway.


Are there any other thoughts in regard to the above?<br>
4. They were moving the RS-545 motor &amp; gearbox up to the top assembly as I left. We also removed the sprockets, and are replacing them with a 32:16 to be able to double the speed. It looked like the 32 would still fit with everything staying exactly in the same spot.
 
5. The lexan panels were being moved to the inside when I left. We will start off securing them will velco, and try to test it if possible to see if it still bows, if so more velcro can be added, and if that doesn’t completely fix it, we can add stiffening lexan, crosswires or other methods that were mentioned last night.
 
6. The back pulleys &amp; belts were being moved to one side to match the front and test the multiple belts theory. It is assumed there is still too much "squish" between the pulleys, but it should work for proof of concept.
 
Tom C took notes from our design meeting last night, and Dave Vadas had some task lists organized, and took down all of our weights and dimensions. (Tom &amp; Dave, if you can get these posted on the wiki, that would be great!!)
 
http://www.penfieldrobotics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Mechanical_1 <br>Basics from what I remember: <br>Top Shooter - Works well, maybe just needs to be sped up, we can replace with 2:1 gearing. <br>Collection - Chicken Plucker/Pool noodle setups work well, no real changes needed? Need to make sure we have all the red/black stiffer pluckers in all of the spots. Even if pluckers go under belts, they don’t seem to unseat them like the VBelts, and even if belts fall off, pluckers are stiff enough to get the balls up into the upper conveyor system.
 
Dividers - seemed to work well, but impact ball storage, and might not be needed, can build up real ones, but not use if not necessary on practice day.
 
Conveyor Belt - Belts falling off seem to be due to side loading, solution is to add more belts. Moving pulleys, or making new shafts out of larger diameter aluminum tubing or PVC are options to get more belts on there. Still need to discuss more on if we will use divider or just full across set of belts.
 
 
 
 
 
Mechanical, as we head into our Fix-It time, please make sure you have familiarized yourself with the rules:
 
'''WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE '''– A limited amount of FABRICATED ITEMS that are permitted to be <br>withheld from the ROBOT shipping requirements (specified in Section 4.10 and Rule &lt;R25&gt;) and <br>retained by the team following the shipping deadlines. These items may then be hand-carried to a <br>competition event by the team. The OPERATOR CONSOLE is automatically included in the <br>WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE. Beyond that, the incoming material maximums specified in Rule <br>&lt;R36&gt; limits the amount of FABRICATED ITEMS included in the WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE.
 
'''FABRICATED ITEM '''– Any COMPONENT or MECHANISM that has been altered, built, cast, <br>constructed, concocted, created, cut, heat treated, machined, manufactured, modified, painted, <br>produced, surface coated, or conjured into the final form in which it will be used on the ROBOT. <br>• Example 1:A piece of extruded aluminum has been ordered by the team, and arrives in a 20- <br>foot length. To make it fit in their storage room, the team cuts it into two ten-foot lengths. These <br>would not be considered FABRICATED ITEMS, as they have not been cut to the final length in <br>which they will be used on the ROBOT. <br>• Example 2: A team designs an arm mechanism that uses gears with a 1/2-inch face width. <br>They order a 12-inch length of gear stock and cut it into precise 1/2 inch slices. They do not <br>bore out the mounting bores in the center of the gears. The slices are now considered <br>FABRICATED ITEMS, as they have been cut to final size, even though all the machining <br>operations (the center bore) may not yet be completed.
 
'''&lt;R26&gt; '''During the period between the shipment of the ROBOT and the competitions: During this period, all teams may manufacture SPARE, REPLACEMENT, and UPGRADE PARTS, and develop software for their ROBOT at their home facility.
 
A. Teams may manufacture all the SPARE, REPLACEMENT and UPGRADE PARTS theywant. <br>B. There is no limit to the amount of time that may be put into this effort, other than via the realities of the calendar.
 
C. Teams may continue development of any items retained under the WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE, continue to work on them during this period, and then bring them to the competition events.
 
D. The total weight of the FABRICATED ITEMS (SPARE, REPLACEMENT, and UPGRADE <br>PARTS, plus all WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE items) worked upon during this period and <br>brought to the competition event(s) must not exceed the limits specified in Rule &lt;R36&gt;. <br>The primary intent of this rule is to allow teams to withhold the ROBOT control system, the <br>OPERATOR CONSOLE, and selected relevant subsystems, and access them after the <br>shipping deadline. This will allow teams to have the maximum time possible prior to each <br>competition event to develop and complete the software for their ROBOT while maximizing <br>the potential to understand and use the capabilities provided by the new control system.
 
'''&lt;R36&gt; '''Teams may bring a maximum of 40 pounds of custom FABRICATED ITEMS (SPARE <br>PARTS, REPLACEMENT PARTS, and UPGRADE PARTS, plus all WITHHOLDING <br>ALLOWANCE items) to each competition event to be used to repair and/or upgrade their <br>ROBOT at the competition site. All other FABRICATED ITEMS to be used on the ROBOT <br>during the competition shall arrive at the competition venue packed in the shipping crate with <br>the ROBOT. <br>• Exception: the OPERATOR CONSOLE is not included in the incoming parts weight restriction.
 
'''OPERATOR CONSOLE''' – the Driver Station unit provided in the FIRST Kit Of Parts, and any <br>associated equipment, control interfaces, display systems, structure, decorations, etc. used by the <br>PILOTS to operate the ROBOT. <br>
 
== Larry's Notes from Just before Ship ==
 
As for Tuesday we did observe that the belts being closer together significantly decreased the about of times the belts fell off and increased pickup efficiency.  The only times we threw the belt was due to there being too many balls in the belts and the shooter wheel not moving.  There will need to be some adjustments with the lexan to prevent jamming. 
We may still need the back divider due to ball jamming but the front may be fine without the divider as long as we implement the changes with more belts closer together.  The chicken pluckers seemed to go a great job of picking up the ball.  Even the side without the belt was able to fling them up to the second stage of pluckers without much problem. 
Both motors on the belts are now the Fisher Price motors.  We tried to run a 2:1 on the spinner motor to increase speed but there was not enough torque to shoot the ball.  So we went back to a 0.93:1 for now.  Maybe we can get a ratio greater than 1 but less than two that will work.  Maybe a 1.5:1. 
The balls kept on getting stuck on the spinner mount that was hanging down so Ted put together some thin lexan guards that seemed to help a little bit but things would still get caught from time to time. 
Balls still go caught on the back bar of the rear trap door sometimes due to the lexan bowing out the back of the robot.  I think some wire behind the lexan will keep this from occurring.
 
So to summarize here are the major things that need to be fixed and my guess as to priority.
Robot Belt assembly (using one of the determined redesign methods that were discussed Monday night)
Shooter Wheel Speed (some optimized gearing ratio torque vs.. Speed)
Balls getting stuck in hopper (maybe divider or more rigid backing will fix)
Balls getting stuck near shooter assembly (reduced due to Ted's fix but still occasionally happening)

Latest revision as of 13:38, 14 November 2010

Discussion moved to: http://www.penfieldrobotics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Mechanical_2.16.2009

Kims Notes

I stopped in this morning, and wanted to update the mechanical teams on what was currently in progress. Larry, Theo and Shauna got there at 6am this morning to start working, I got there about 7:30, and Ted & Rika arrived around 8:15.

1. The burnt RS-545 motor from the back conveyor was removed & replaced with a fischer Price motor (I think last night), but then this morning we switched it back to an RS-545 (realized we already had 2 Fischer Price setups)

2. The Fischer Price & gearbox was removed from the top shooter assembly, and is now mounted in place for the back conveyor so both conveyors now have Fischer Price Motors with the good pinion setups (we found that the pinions were cracking because the FP shafts were just slightly larger, so Larry turned down the shafts and pressed the pinions on this time - and they even sound much better!!)

3. I ordered 10 more pinion gears, and an RS-385 25:1 transmission. They did not have any more of the 545's so we can take the mounting plate from the extra transmission (or one if we damage it), and the 25:1 planetary gearboxes are the same, so we just move the transmission plate over and have a replacement gearbox. The new gearbox is strictly as a spare anyway.

4. They were moving the RS-545 motor & gearbox up to the top assembly as I left. We also removed the sprockets, and are replacing them with a 32:16 to be able to double the speed. It looked like the 32 would still fit with everything staying exactly in the same spot.

5. The lexan panels were being moved to the inside when I left. We will start off securing them will velco, and try to test it if possible to see if it still bows, if so more velcro can be added, and if that doesn’t completely fix it, we can add stiffening lexan, crosswires or other methods that were mentioned last night.

6. The back pulleys & belts were being moved to one side to match the front and test the multiple belts theory. It is assumed there is still too much "squish" between the pulleys, but it should work for proof of concept.

Tom C took notes from our design meeting last night, and Dave Vadas had some task lists organized, and took down all of our weights and dimensions. (Tom & Dave, if you can get these posted on the wiki, that would be great!!)

http://www.penfieldrobotics.com/wiki/index.php?title=Mechanical_1
Basics from what I remember:
Top Shooter - Works well, maybe just needs to be sped up, we can replace with 2:1 gearing.
Collection - Chicken Plucker/Pool noodle setups work well, no real changes needed? Need to make sure we have all the red/black stiffer pluckers in all of the spots. Even if pluckers go under belts, they don’t seem to unseat them like the VBelts, and even if belts fall off, pluckers are stiff enough to get the balls up into the upper conveyor system.

Dividers - seemed to work well, but impact ball storage, and might not be needed, can build up real ones, but not use if not necessary on practice day.

Conveyor Belt - Belts falling off seem to be due to side loading, solution is to add more belts. Moving pulleys, or making new shafts out of larger diameter aluminum tubing or PVC are options to get more belts on there. Still need to discuss more on if we will use divider or just full across set of belts.



Mechanical, as we head into our Fix-It time, please make sure you have familiarized yourself with the rules:

WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE – A limited amount of FABRICATED ITEMS that are permitted to be
withheld from the ROBOT shipping requirements (specified in Section 4.10 and Rule <R25>) and
retained by the team following the shipping deadlines. These items may then be hand-carried to a
competition event by the team. The OPERATOR CONSOLE is automatically included in the
WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE. Beyond that, the incoming material maximums specified in Rule
<R36> limits the amount of FABRICATED ITEMS included in the WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE.

FABRICATED ITEM – Any COMPONENT or MECHANISM that has been altered, built, cast,
constructed, concocted, created, cut, heat treated, machined, manufactured, modified, painted,
produced, surface coated, or conjured into the final form in which it will be used on the ROBOT.
• Example 1:A piece of extruded aluminum has been ordered by the team, and arrives in a 20-
foot length. To make it fit in their storage room, the team cuts it into two ten-foot lengths. These
would not be considered FABRICATED ITEMS, as they have not been cut to the final length in
which they will be used on the ROBOT.
• Example 2: A team designs an arm mechanism that uses gears with a 1/2-inch face width.
They order a 12-inch length of gear stock and cut it into precise 1/2 inch slices. They do not
bore out the mounting bores in the center of the gears. The slices are now considered
FABRICATED ITEMS, as they have been cut to final size, even though all the machining
operations (the center bore) may not yet be completed.

<R26> During the period between the shipment of the ROBOT and the competitions: During this period, all teams may manufacture SPARE, REPLACEMENT, and UPGRADE PARTS, and develop software for their ROBOT at their home facility.

A. Teams may manufacture all the SPARE, REPLACEMENT and UPGRADE PARTS theywant.
B. There is no limit to the amount of time that may be put into this effort, other than via the realities of the calendar.

C. Teams may continue development of any items retained under the WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE, continue to work on them during this period, and then bring them to the competition events.

D. The total weight of the FABRICATED ITEMS (SPARE, REPLACEMENT, and UPGRADE
PARTS, plus all WITHHOLDING ALLOWANCE items) worked upon during this period and
brought to the competition event(s) must not exceed the limits specified in Rule <R36>.
The primary intent of this rule is to allow teams to withhold the ROBOT control system, the
OPERATOR CONSOLE, and selected relevant subsystems, and access them after the
shipping deadline. This will allow teams to have the maximum time possible prior to each
competition event to develop and complete the software for their ROBOT while maximizing
the potential to understand and use the capabilities provided by the new control system.

<R36> Teams may bring a maximum of 40 pounds of custom FABRICATED ITEMS (SPARE
PARTS, REPLACEMENT PARTS, and UPGRADE PARTS, plus all WITHHOLDING
ALLOWANCE items) to each competition event to be used to repair and/or upgrade their
ROBOT at the competition site. All other FABRICATED ITEMS to be used on the ROBOT
during the competition shall arrive at the competition venue packed in the shipping crate with
the ROBOT.
• Exception: the OPERATOR CONSOLE is not included in the incoming parts weight restriction.

OPERATOR CONSOLE – the Driver Station unit provided in the FIRST Kit Of Parts, and any
associated equipment, control interfaces, display systems, structure, decorations, etc. used by the
PILOTS to operate the ROBOT.

Larry's Notes from Just before Ship

As for Tuesday we did observe that the belts being closer together significantly decreased the about of times the belts fell off and increased pickup efficiency. The only times we threw the belt was due to there being too many balls in the belts and the shooter wheel not moving. There will need to be some adjustments with the lexan to prevent jamming.

We may still need the back divider due to ball jamming but the front may be fine without the divider as long as we implement the changes with more belts closer together. The chicken pluckers seemed to go a great job of picking up the ball. Even the side without the belt was able to fling them up to the second stage of pluckers without much problem.

Both motors on the belts are now the Fisher Price motors. We tried to run a 2:1 on the spinner motor to increase speed but there was not enough torque to shoot the ball. So we went back to a 0.93:1 for now. Maybe we can get a ratio greater than 1 but less than two that will work. Maybe a 1.5:1.

The balls kept on getting stuck on the spinner mount that was hanging down so Ted put together some thin lexan guards that seemed to help a little bit but things would still get caught from time to time.

Balls still go caught on the back bar of the rear trap door sometimes due to the lexan bowing out the back of the robot. I think some wire behind the lexan will keep this from occurring.

So to summarize here are the major things that need to be fixed and my guess as to priority. Robot Belt assembly (using one of the determined redesign methods that were discussed Monday night) Shooter Wheel Speed (some optimized gearing ratio torque vs.. Speed) Balls getting stuck in hopper (maybe divider or more rigid backing will fix) Balls getting stuck near shooter assembly (reduced due to Ted's fix but still occasionally happening)