2011:Mechanical 2 1.29: Difference between revisions
From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: = Attendance = '''Start time: ''' '''End time: ''' '''Members present: ''' '''Members Attending Next Meeting: ''' = Tasks Completed = *task **sub-task **sub-task *task = Tasks In Pr...) |
Mechanical2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Attendance = | = Attendance = | ||
'''Start time: ''' | '''Start time: 10''' | ||
'''End time: ''' | '''End time: 8:30''' | ||
'''Members present: ''' | '''Members present: Brianna M, Jake K, Alex W, Ethan M, Mr. K, Mr. W.''' | ||
'''Members Attending Next Meeting: ''' | '''Members Attending Next Meeting:''' | ||
= Tasks Completed = | = Tasks Completed = | ||
* | *tested prototypes | ||
** | **compared folding v. telescoping arm | ||
** | ***'''r'''e'''l'''e'''a'''s'''e''' m'''e'''c'''h'''a'''n'''i'''s'''m '''-''' n'''e'''e'''d'''s '''1''' p'''e'''r'''s'''o'''n''' for folding arm, 2 for telescoping arm | ||
* | ***telescoping - may stick inside, in case of being skewed is useless and unfixable | ||
***folding arm is overall better, as it has a harder time breaking, has less friction | |||
***both have a simple stopping mechanism that should work quite well - latch-fold pin-tele | |||
***''NOTE'': telescoping prototype did not work at all at first - telescoping part was too rough | |||
***Upper structure 85% done. | |||
**determined which arm to use(telescope or folding[scale 1-10 {1 worst 10 best}] | |||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" summary="The column design won!" cellpadding="1" width="800" align="left" | |||
|- | |||
| <br> | |||
| folding<br> | |||
| telescope<br> | |||
|- | |||
| does it work<br> | |||
| 9<br> | |||
| 3.5<br> | |||
|- | |||
| realibility(prototype or design error)<br> | |||
| 10<br> | |||
| 4<br> | |||
|- | |||
| how much force can it take<br> | |||
| 9.5(prototype only 1 side of the latch was used, in final design both sides would be used, making the final design stronger)<br> | |||
| N/A<br> | |||
|- | |||
| how easy is it to reset<br> | |||
| 9<br> | |||
| 2 People failry easy<br> | |||
|- | |||
| autonomous mode<br> | |||
| N/A<br> | |||
| N/A<br> | |||
|- | |||
| speed, timing<br> | |||
| 9 (fast)<br> | |||
| 7<br> | |||
|- | |||
| how easy is it to fix<br> | |||
| 9(outside plates and latches are the only things that might break. if they break they are very easy to replace)<br> | |||
| 7(arm could possibly break completly making it very hard to repair, unless you have a spare arm)<br> | |||
|- | |||
| which one has the most play<br> | |||
| similar<br> | |||
| similar<br> | |||
|- | |||
| release mechanism<br> | |||
| 9(1 person)<br> | |||
| (2people)<br> | |||
|- | |||
| speed of deployment<br> | |||
| 9 <br> | |||
| 8<br> | |||
|- | |||
| übertube loading<br> | |||
| 9(arm simply folds at the beggining of the match)<br> | |||
| 4(arm has to be tucked in all the way, could create problems) <br> | |||
|- | |||
| total<br> | |||
| 82.5<br> | |||
| 43.5<br> | |||
|} | |||
*** | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
= Tasks In Progress = | |||
*Arm prototype latch tests: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJdY1KuXMQw&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1 | |||
= | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skjqu8gzZQ4&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1 | ||
*task | *[[Www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJdY1KuXMQw&safety mode=true&persist safety mode=1|watch]] | ||
**sub-task | *[[Www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skjqu8gzZQ4&safety mode=true&persist safety mode=1|watch]] | ||
*task | |||
**sub-task | |||
**sub-task | **sub-task | ||
*task | *task | ||
= Tasks to Complete = | = Tasks to Complete = | ||
* | *finalize dimensioning arm | ||
= Materials Needed = | = Materials Needed = | ||
*task | *task | ||
**sub-task | **sub-task | ||
**sub-task | **sub-task | ||
*task | *task |
Latest revision as of 06:51, 30 January 2011
Attendance
Start time: 10
End time: 8:30
Members present: Brianna M, Jake K, Alex W, Ethan M, Mr. K, Mr. W.
Members Attending Next Meeting:
Tasks Completed
- tested prototypes
- compared folding v. telescoping arm
- release mechanism - needs 1 person for folding arm, 2 for telescoping arm
- telescoping - may stick inside, in case of being skewed is useless and unfixable
- folding arm is overall better, as it has a harder time breaking, has less friction
- both have a simple stopping mechanism that should work quite well - latch-fold pin-tele
- NOTE: telescoping prototype did not work at all at first - telescoping part was too rough
- Upper structure 85% done.
- determined which arm to use(telescope or folding[scale 1-10 {1 worst 10 best}]
- compared folding v. telescoping arm
folding |
telescope | |
does it work |
9 |
3.5 |
realibility(prototype or design error) |
10 |
4 |
how much force can it take |
9.5(prototype only 1 side of the latch was used, in final design both sides would be used, making the final design stronger) |
N/A |
how easy is it to reset |
9 |
2 People failry easy |
autonomous mode |
N/A |
N/A |
speed, timing |
9 (fast) |
7 |
how easy is it to fix |
9(outside plates and latches are the only things that might break. if they break they are very easy to replace) |
7(arm could possibly break completly making it very hard to repair, unless you have a spare arm) |
which one has the most play |
similar |
similar |
release mechanism |
9(1 person) |
(2people) |
speed of deployment |
9 |
8 |
übertube loading |
9(arm simply folds at the beggining of the match) |
4(arm has to be tucked in all the way, could create problems) |
total |
82.5 |
43.5 |
Tasks In Progress
- Arm prototype latch tests: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJdY1KuXMQw&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skjqu8gzZQ4&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1
Tasks to Complete
- finalize dimensioning arm
Materials Needed
- task
- sub-task
- sub-task
- task