2009:Electrical 1.14.09: Difference between revisions
From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (Electrical 1.14.09 moved to 2009:Electrical 1.14.09) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
01.14.2009 | 01.14.2009 | ||
'''Start time: '''7:30<br> | '''Start time: '''7:30<br> | ||
'''End time: '''9pm<br> | '''End time: '''9pm<br> | ||
'''Members present: '''Michael, Rika, Crystal, Sean, Karen, Victor<br> | '''Members present: '''Michael, Rika, Crystal, Sean, Josh, Karen, Victor<br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Tasks Completed:'''<br> | '''Tasks Completed:'''<br> | ||
*Discussed the pros and cons of mounting positions--transmission/chassis or hopper | *Discussed the pros and cons of mounting positions--transmission/chassis or hopper | ||
<br> | |||
Pros on Chassis --> (Over CIM motors) | |||
*Better protection | |||
*Less pain!!! | |||
*More secure | |||
* | <br> | ||
*Less | |||
* | Cons on all Chassis | ||
*3" marker limit - which makes our first design fail. | |||
*Difficult access | |||
*Less clearance and more cramming | |||
*Difficult wiring | |||
*Larger chance of shorts | |||
<br> | |||
Pros on Mounting on Hopper | |||
*Lots of space | |||
*Small chance of shorts because of space | |||
*<br> | |||
Cons for Mounting on Hopper | |||
*Weight concerning large guage wire | |||
*If mounted on lexan, unstable | |||
*If tipped, electronics could get damaged<br> | |||
<br> | |||
Height of CRio<br> | |||
*Need 6.5" minimum - 8" maximum Data cable from CRio Digital Side car<br> | |||
<br> | |||
Sensors at Top of conveyor and bottom of conveyor<br> | |||
Currently have 1<br> | |||
Banners are functional - Can be used.<br> | |||
To do - Investigate OMRONs (Order from Digikey? 16.81 in onsies) - 11mm sensing distance - Is this good enough?<br> | |||
Detectable distance (See Note.) 11 ¦ 2 mm (Black paper and OHP paper) 11 ¦ 8 mm (White paper)<br>Non-detectable distance (See Note.) 20 mm (Black sponge) 45 mm (White paper) <br> | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
---- | |||
<u></u>'''Helpful Links to Sensor pages, ect.<u></u>'''<u></u><br> | |||
'''[http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=OR580-ND Digikey Omron Reflective Sensor]''' | |||
'''[http://www.newark.com/pdfs/datasheets/Omron/EE-SPY415.pdf Above Sensors PDF info]''' | |||
Talked about photoreflective vs. Photo "beam break" sensors<br> | |||
[http://www.euclidres.com/motionSensors/motionSensors.html#other '''How a reflective Sensor functions''']<br> | |||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Tasks In Progress:'''<br> | '''Tasks In Progress:'''<br> | ||
*Process on choosing mount locations-- Chassis or Hopper<br> | *Process on choosing mount locations-- Chassis or Hopper<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
'''Tasks to Complete: '''<br> | '''Tasks to Complete: '''<br> | ||
*Talk to Mechanical 1/2 for status on Chassis, do we still have a 3" limit? WE NEED DIMENSIONS.<br> | *Talk to Mechanical 1/2 for status on Chassis, do we still have a 3" limit? WE NEED DIMENSIONS.<br> | ||
*Aquire transmission dimensions | *Aquire transmission dimensions | ||
*Hybrid design..? Some on Chassis and some on Hopper? | *Hybrid design..? Some on Chassis and some on Hopper? | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 71: | Line 101: | ||
(Use the upload file button on the toolbox to the left to upload the file, then insert an image using the button above. Sizing can be done using the length/width pixel size) | (Use the upload file button on the toolbox to the left to upload the file, then insert an image using the button above. Sizing can be done using the length/width pixel size) | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Electrical Main|Electrical Main Main Page]] | [[Electrical Main|Electrical Main Main Page]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 14 November 2010
01.14.2009
Start time: 7:30
End time: 9pm
Members present: Michael, Rika, Crystal, Sean, Josh, Karen, Victor
Tasks Completed:
- Discussed the pros and cons of mounting positions--transmission/chassis or hopper
Pros on Chassis --> (Over CIM motors)
- Better protection
- Less pain!!!
- More secure
Cons on all Chassis
- 3" marker limit - which makes our first design fail.
- Difficult access
- Less clearance and more cramming
- Difficult wiring
- Larger chance of shorts
Pros on Mounting on Hopper
- Lots of space
- Small chance of shorts because of space
Cons for Mounting on Hopper
- Weight concerning large guage wire
- If mounted on lexan, unstable
- If tipped, electronics could get damaged
Height of CRio
- Need 6.5" minimum - 8" maximum Data cable from CRio Digital Side car
Sensors at Top of conveyor and bottom of conveyor
Currently have 1
Banners are functional - Can be used.
To do - Investigate OMRONs (Order from Digikey? 16.81 in onsies) - 11mm sensing distance - Is this good enough?
Detectable distance (See Note.) 11 ¦ 2 mm (Black paper and OHP paper) 11 ¦ 8 mm (White paper)
Non-detectable distance (See Note.) 20 mm (Black sponge) 45 mm (White paper)
Helpful Links to Sensor pages, ect.
Digikey Omron Reflective Sensor
Talked about photoreflective vs. Photo "beam break" sensors
How a reflective Sensor functions
Tasks In Progress:
- Process on choosing mount locations-- Chassis or Hopper
Tasks to Complete:
- Talk to Mechanical 1/2 for status on Chassis, do we still have a 3" limit? WE NEED DIMENSIONS.
- Aquire transmission dimensions
- Hybrid design..? Some on Chassis and some on Hopper?
Images & Additional Updates:
(Use the upload file button on the toolbox to the left to upload the file, then insert an image using the button above. Sizing can be done using the length/width pixel size)
