2012:Mechanical: Difference between revisions

From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
 


Beater Bar
'''Beater Bar'''
 
 


[http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si]
[http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si]
Line 22: Line 20:


Roughtop Tread 8" OD x 2" Wide ROUGHTOP-820 In stock
Roughtop Tread 8" OD x 2" Wide ROUGHTOP-820 In stock
  *Placed Collector/Actuator onto Robot assembly
  *Made Sprocket  http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0099.htm
  *Made Bearing for Beater bar  http://www.mcmaster.com/#6383k234/=fwn7tc
  *Figured out we neeed a larger shaft and sorted out following problems
      -Size/Placement issues
      -How to make a sprocket in inventor


&nbsp; <u>'''Conveyor System:'''</u>
&nbsp; <u>'''Conveyor System:'''</u>

Latest revision as of 15:06, 21 January 2012

Resources

Master Task List

Engineering Notebook Templates Available at: Engineering_Notebook_Template

Please Label All Notebook Pages 2012:Mechanical 2 MM.DD to avoid confusion.

 

 

Beater Bar

http://www.mcmaster.com/#aluminum-hollow-rods/=fun3si

 

http://www.vexrobotics.com/products/vexpro/ifi-wheel-tread.html

Roughtop Tread 8" OD x 2" Wide ROUGHTOP-820 In stock

 *Placed Collector/Actuator onto Robot assembly
 *Made Sprocket   http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0099.htm
 *Made Bearing for Beater bar   http://www.mcmaster.com/#6383k234/=fwn7tc

 *Figured out we neeed a larger shaft and sorted out following problems
      -Size/Placement issues
      -How to make a sprocket in inventor


  Conveyor System:

  conveyor system pros and cons -

Design 1: Motors Only
Pros:
• Constant speed (assuming battery voltage does not drop dramatically)
• More space below the conveyor to accommodate the drivetrain transmissions and motors.
• Smooth transmission between different stages of the conveyor to the turret.
• Less possible states for the last stage of the design.
Cons:
• Cannot actually push the ball past the turret line. There needs to be a hand off so there will be a transition stage.
Design 2: Pneumatics and Motors
Pros:
• Need one less motor.
• Compressor is already on the robot.
• Higher handoff to the turret, goes past the turret line.
• Lower height than turret.
• When the supply is available, speed and force of ball feed will be consistant.
Cons:
• Takes up more space in the back bottom part of the robot.
• Requires ball to settle time into cup prior to firing.
• Lose contact with ball when going into last stage.
• Hard to manufacture the bowl for the launcher unless we buy it, work around could be square on point.
• Amy and Mr. Wolf feel that the linear action is more complicated than the rotary action.

 

 

Archives

2011 Mechanical Page2010 Mechanical Page2009 Mechanical_1 Page