2019:Drive Base: Difference between revisions
From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
Programming (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Programming (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"> | <div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"> | ||
<div class="mw-parser-output"> | |||
== Decisions and Specifications == | == Decisions and Specifications == | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
Dimensions: 34L x less than 28W | Dimensions: 34L x less than 28W | ||
Wheels: | |||
Belts: | |||
Motors: | |||
| | ||
</div> | |||
== Activity Log == | == Activity Log == |
Revision as of 18:10, 8 January 2019
Decisions and Specifications
Dimensions: 34L x less than 28W
Wheels:
Belts:
Motors:
Activity Log
Saturday Week 1
Jonathan Farnham
- Kickoff
- prelimanary ideas developed by drive base team
- areas of concern
- ramp to H1: 3 inches
- H2 height above bumpers
- drive base will never scale H3
Sunday Week 1
Jonathan Farnham
- used cad to study wheels needed for H2
- tested 4,6,and 8 wheel configs
Tuesday Week 1
By Jonathan Farnham
- decisions being made about drive train configuration
-
- wheel size decisions need to be made
- choice of motor needs to be made: Cim or Neo
- number of wheels needs to be decided
- developed cad prototype base on variant of last years drive system
- waiting on decision from strategy about habitat 2 or habitat 3 requirement
- does drive base have to scale H2?
- If we scale H3 then can we use smaller wheels on drive base?
- does drive base have to develop H2 solution?
- Length of robot has been decided to be 34in.
Wedensday Week 1