2019:Drive Base: Difference between revisions
From 1511Wookiee
Jump to navigationJump to search
Programming (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Programming (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"> | <div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"><div class="mw-parser-output"> | ||
<div class="mw-parser-output"> | |||
== Decisions and Specifications == | == Decisions and Specifications == | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
| | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Activity Log == | == Activity Log == | ||
Line 25: | Line 23: | ||
*Kickoff | *Kickoff | ||
* | *Prelimanary ideas developed by drive base team | ||
* | *Areas of concern | ||
** | **Ramp to H1: 3 inches | ||
**H2 height above bumpers | **H2 height above bumpers | ||
** | **Drive base will never scale H3 | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
Jonathan Farnham | Jonathan Farnham | ||
* | *Developed four inch wheel prototype | ||
*[[File:DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg|400px|DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg]] | *[[File:DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg|400px|DriveBasePrototype1.jpeg]] | ||
* | *Used field to test four inch wheels on ramp | ||
| | ||
* | *Used cad to study wheels needed for H2 | ||
** | **Tested 4,6,and 8 wheel configs | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 52: | Line 50: | ||
By Jonathan Farnham | By Jonathan Farnham | ||
* | *Decisions being made about drive train configuration | ||
* | * | ||
** | **Wheel size decisions need to be made | ||
** | **Choice of motor needs to be made: Cim or Neo | ||
** | **Number of wheels needs to be decided | ||
*developed cad prototype base on variant of last years drive system | *Mr.C developed skid plate study for 4 inch wheel | ||
[[File:SkidPlateStudy.jpg|400px]][[File:SkidPlateStudyDetail.jpg|400px]] | |||
| |||
*Developed cad prototype base on variant of last years drive system | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[File:DriveBaseSegment1.PNG|600px|DriveBaseSegment1.PNG]] | [[File:DriveBaseSegment1.PNG|600px|DriveBaseSegment1.PNG]] | ||
Line 63: | Line 67: | ||
| | ||
* | *Waiting on decision from strategy about habitat 2 or habitat 3 requirement | ||
** | **Does drive base have to scale H2? | ||
**If we scale H3 then can we use smaller wheels on drive base? | **If we scale H3 then can we use smaller wheels on drive base? | ||
** | **Does drive base have to develop H2 solution? | ||
*'''''Length of robot has been decided to be 34in.''''' | *'''''Length of robot has been decided to be 34in.''''' | ||
Line 74: | Line 78: | ||
| | ||
</div> </div> </div> </div> </div> | </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> |
Revision as of 18:27, 8 January 2019
Decisions and Specifications
Dimensions: 34L x less than 28W
Wheels:
Belts:
Motors:
Activity Log
Saturday Week 1
Jonathan Farnham
- Kickoff
- Prelimanary ideas developed by drive base team
- Areas of concern
- Ramp to H1: 3 inches
- H2 height above bumpers
- Drive base will never scale H3
Sunday Week 1
Jonathan Farnham
- Used cad to study wheels needed for H2
- Tested 4,6,and 8 wheel configs
Tuesday Week 1
By Jonathan Farnham
- Decisions being made about drive train configuration
-
- Wheel size decisions need to be made
- Choice of motor needs to be made: Cim or Neo
- Number of wheels needs to be decided
- Mr.C developed skid plate study for 4 inch wheel
- Developed cad prototype base on variant of last years drive system
- Waiting on decision from strategy about habitat 2 or habitat 3 requirement
- Does drive base have to scale H2?
- If we scale H3 then can we use smaller wheels on drive base?
- Does drive base have to develop H2 solution?
- Length of robot has been decided to be 34in.
Wedensday Week 1